Let's just erase slavery, shall we?

Trump has ordered the National Park Service to remove this photo from a Smithsonian display on the history of slavery.

Because it's not POSITIVE enough, FFS.

There is NOTHING positiver about fucking SLAVERY!

How can you see photographic evidence of the evil that was slavery in the US and still claim that slavery had its fucking GOOD POINTS?

Trump needs to be removed from office, NOW! By any fucking means necessary. Legal of course, though a coups would be welcome at this point. Just be clear, I'm not calling for his extermination, even though he is a fucking flea infested rabid rat who eats cockroaches for breakfast.

Biblical Bullshit: The Full Catalog of Biblical Incest

The Bible is hailed as the ultimate moral guide, a divine instruction manual for righteous living. But if you actually read the damn thing, what you get is a parade of incestuous unions, patriarchal loopholes, and divine silence that would make any modern ethics board spontaneously combust.

If you still think the Bible is a moral guide, buckle up. This isn’t a gentle unpacking, it’s a full forensic catalog of incest, hypocrisy, and divine silence. From father-daughter drunken sex to cousin marriages passed off as holy lineage, scripture reads like a family reunion hosted in a crime scene. Every name, every blood tie, every moral contradiction laid bare. No cherry-picking. No apologetics. Just the sacred mess, documented and salted for clarity.

Below is the full catalog of incest in the Bible, narrative, inferred, and genealogical. Every name, every blood tie, every moral contradiction that I could track down. Salted. Biblically documented. Undeniable.

DIRECT NARRATIVE CASES (Explicit or Strongly Implied)

1. Lot + His Daughters  

   - Relationship: Father/daughters  

   - Reference: Genesis 19:30–38  

   - Consanguinity: 1st degree  

   - Notes: Daughters get Lot drunk and sleep with him. Twice. Sons born: Moab and Ben-Ammi. No divine punishment. Just legacy.

2. Abraham + Sarah  

   - Relationship: Half-siblings  

   - Reference: Genesis 20:12  

   - Consanguinity: 2nd degree  

   - Notes: Married. Praised. Would be banned under Leviticus. God’s chosen incest.

3. Reuben + Bilhah  

   - Relationship: Son/father’s concubine  

   - Reference: Genesis 35:22  

   - Consanguinity: Stepmother  

   - Notes: Reuben sleeps with Jacob’s concubine. Condemned in Genesis 49:4.

4. Amnon + Tamar  

   - Relationship: Half-brother/half-sister  

   - Reference: 2 Samuel 13  

   - Consanguinity: 2nd degree  

   - Notes: Rape. David does nothing. God says nothing. Absalom kills Amnon.

5. Judah + Tamar  

   - Relationship: Father-in-law/daughter-in-law  

   - Reference: Genesis 38  

   - Consanguinity: Affinal  

   - Notes: Tamar disguises herself. Judah sleeps with her. She gets pregnant. No rebuke.

6. Corinthian Man + Stepmother  

   - Relationship: Stepson/father’s wife  

   - Reference: 1 Corinthians 5:1  

   - Consanguinity: Affinal  

   - Notes: Paul condemns it. One of the few times incest gets called out.

INFERRED OR GENEALOGICAL CASES (Early Humanity, Patriarchal Lineage)

7. Cain + His Wife  

   - Relationship: Sibling or niece  

   - Reference: Genesis 4:17  

   - Consanguinity: 1st or 2nd degree  

   - Notes: No other humans mentioned. Population logic demands incest.

8. Seth + His Wife  

   - Relationship: Sibling or niece  

   - Reference: Genesis 4:25–26  

   - Consanguinity: 1st or 2nd degree  

   - Notes: Same population constraint. No condemnation.

9. Noah’s Sons + Their Wives  

   - Relationship: Nephews/aunts or cousins  

   - Reference: Genesis 6:18  

   - Consanguinity: Unknown but intra-family  

   - Notes: Humanity rebooted via incest. Divine plan.

10. Isaac + Rebekah  

    - Relationship: First cousins once removed  

    - Reference: Genesis 24:15  

    - Consanguinity: 3rd degree  

    - Notes: Rebekah is granddaughter of Abraham’s brother.

11. Jacob + Leah/Rachel  

    - Relationship: First cousins  

    - Reference: Genesis 29  

    - Consanguinity: 3rd degree  

    - Notes: Sisters. Daughters of Laban, Rebekah’s brother.

12. Esau + Mahalath  

    - Relationship: First cousins  

    - Reference: Genesis 28:9  

    - Consanguinity: 3rd degree  

    - Notes: Mahalath is daughter of Ishmael, Abraham’s son.

13. David + Michal  

    - Relationship: First cousins  

    - Reference: 1 Samuel 18:27  

    - Consanguinity: 3rd degree  

    - Notes: Michal is daughter of Saul, David’s uncle.

14. David + Abigail  

    - Relationship: Possibly cousin  

    - Reference: 1 Samuel 25  

    - Consanguinity: Unknown  

    - Notes: Lineage debated. Likely kin.

15. Solomon + Royal Wives  

    - Relationship: Foreign and possibly kin  

    - Reference: 1 Kings 11  

    - Consanguinity: Political incest  

    - Notes: Hundreds of wives. Royal alliances often involved family ties.

LEGAL PROHIBITIONS (Leviticus 18 & 20)

Leviticus bans sex with:

- Parent or child

- Sibling (full or half)

- Grandparent or grandchild

- Aunt/uncle and niece/nephew

- In-laws (father’s wife, brother’s wife)

- Step-relations (stepmother, stepsister)

- Mother and daughter simultaneously

These laws were written long after the patriarchs had already built Israel’s bloodline on incest, because Gawd hadn't sorted his shit out yet. Or something. Retroactive morality isn’t morality, it’s damage control.

THEOLOGICAL WHIPLASH

What’s condemned in Leviticus is celebrated in Genesis. What’s punished in Corinth is ignored in Jerusalem. The Bible doesn’t offer a timeless moral code, it offers a tribal mess of shifting standards, divine favoritism, and incestuous legacy-building.

If incest is wrong, then the Bible is guilty. If incest is wrong in Leviticus, it sure as shit is wrong in Genesis, and an omniscient God would have made that clear THEN instead as an OH! By the WAY! generations later. If morality is absolute, then scripture is a contradiction. And if this book is supposed to guide our ethics, we’d better be ready to explain why God’s favorites kept marrying their fucking cousins, raping their sisters, and sleeping with their stepmothers without so much as a divine slap on the wrist.

So, yeah, it turns out the Bible is just chock full of incest. It goes beyond the obvious "oops, got my dad drunk" moments and is a recurring theme in the patriarchs' lives, especially with cousins. It was the preferred way to do things before the laws in Leviticus came along and said, "Okay, we have enough people now, maybe don't bang your relatives."

The Bible may be sacred. But it’s not clean. And it sure as FUCK isn’t consistent.

This is the first in a series of Biblical Bullshit articles in the works.

She Didn’t Marry Her Rapist. She Burned the Fucking Script.

In 1966, Franca Viola didn’t just refuse to marry her rapist, she detonated the entire rotten scaffolding of Italy’s bullshit "honor" culture. She was 17. She had been kidnapped, beaten, and raped repeatedly by Filippo fucking Melodia, a mafia-adjacent scumbucket who thought he could force her into a “rehabilitating marriage” to restore her “honor.” That was the law. That was the custom. That was the grotesque social contract: rape her, then marry her, and walk free. And then he could rape her every night for the rest of her life, and nobody would bat a motherfucking eye.

Franca Viola said "FUCK no!"

She said no to Melodia. No to the courts. No to the townspeople who burned her family’s barn and vineyard in retaliation. No to the centuries of patriarchal rot that taught women their worth was measured in virginity and silence. She stood in court and named her rapist. She refused the paciata (the appeasement ritual). She chose justice over shame, legacy over fear.

And her family paid the price.

Her father Bernardo Viola didn’t force her to marry her rapist. He didn’t cave to mafia threats or social pressure. He asked her what she wanted, and when she said no, he backed her with every ounce of strength he had. For that act of integrity, the Viola family was ostracized, menaced, and persecuted by their own community. Their property was torched. Their name was dragged. Because in a piece of shit society that worships “honor,” protecting your daughter makes you a traitor.

But Franca didn’t just survive. She lived.

Years later, she married a man she *chose*, Giuseppe Ruisi, her childhood friend. They built a life together, raised children, and stayed rooted in Alcamo, the same town that once tried to shame her into silence. Her legacy is not just defiance, it’s reclamation! She didn’t vanish. She didn’t hide. She stayed, she loved, and she thrived.

Filippo Melodia was convicted. He served a fraction of what he deserved. He died in a mafia hit years later, and no one mourned. Good fucking riddance to the rapey rapist motherfucker.

But the real reckoning isn’t his death. It’s the legacy Franca Viola carved with her refusal. She became a symbol of resistance, of absolute surgical clarity, of rage that refuses to be domesticated. Her story is a scalpel to the throat of every society that still asks, “What was she wearing?” or “Did she fight back?”

She fought. She won. And she never apologized.

Gollum in a Gucci Gown: The Face That Launched a Thousand Screams

When you start looking like fucking Gollum, maybe it's time to stop with the plastic surgery?

Once upon a time, Madonna Ciccone was a lovely looking woman. Fresh faced, classic movie star looks. And she was aging pretty gracefully for a while there. Then somewhere along the way, she got this idea that she would look even better if she had some "work" done. Now she looks like she needs to move to a cave in Middle Earth.

Botox, fillers, scalpels, peels. She's had so much shit done to her poor fucking face that she probably bought a doctor or three brand new Cybertrucks and Lear Jets. And she ended up looking like something out of a child's worst nightmares. That's not good surgery, that's fucking malpractice and poor decision making on public display.

Tell me what the FUCK is wrong with looking older? Why are wrinkles so detested by so many people who develop them? How can these people imagine that plastic surgery makes them attractive? 

Look at Jamie Lee Curtis. LOOK at her! When she was 25 years old, a cinematographer told her that her eyes were baggy, so she decided to get some fillers. She immediately hated the result, and swore off all future work. Jamie Lee is 66 years old now, and just absolutely fucking BEAUTIFUL. She SHINES! Her hair is white. Her face has wrinkles. She looks her age, dammit. And she's still one of the most beautiful women I have ever seen on a screen. She's timeless.

I wish women would stop turning themselves into freaks. Embrace who the fuck you are. You earned your wrinkles and sags. Wear them with PRIDE!

It's somewhat strange to me that Jamie Lee Curtis started her career as a scream queen, but Madonna is FINISHING her own as one.

Kirk SAID This Shit! Verbal Diarrhea from A Fucking Asshole.

This is the motherfucker that the MAGA fucks want to beatify. Racist, Misogynist, hateful piece of shit. These are his own goddam words. I got the list from The Guardian, which pulled them from the motherfucker's podcast.

---

On race:

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024

If you’re a WNBA, pot-smoking, Black lesbian, do you get treated better than a United States marine?

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 8 December 2022

Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023

If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024

If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023

On gun violence:

I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.

– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023

On immigration:

America was at its peak when we halted immigration for 40 years and we dropped our foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever. We should be unafraid to do that.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 22 August 2025

The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 20 March 2024

The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 1 March 2024

On debate:

We record all of it so that we put [it] on the internet so people can see these ideas collide. When people stop talking, that’s when you get violence. That’s when civil war happens, because you start to think the other side is so evil, and they lose their humanity.

– Kirk discussing his work in an undated clip that circulated on X after his killing.

Prove me wrong.

– Kirk’s challenge to students to publicly debate him during the tour of colleges he was on when he was assassinated.

On gender, feminism and reproductive rights

Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.

– Discussing news of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s engagement on The Charlie Kirk Show, 26 August 2025

The answer is yes, the baby would be delivered.

– Responding to a question about whether he would support his 10-year-old daughter aborting a pregnancy conceived because of rape on the debate show Surrounded, published on 8 September 2024

– On Transgender medical care.

We need to have a Nuremberg-style trial for every gender-affirming clinic doctor. We need it immediately.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 1 April 2024

On Islam:

America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank: large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 30 April 2025

We’ve been warning about the rise of Islam on the show, to great amount of backlash. We don’t care, that’s what we do here. And we said that Islam is not compatible with western civilization.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 24 June 2025

Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America.

– Charlie Kirk social media post, 8 September 2025

On religion

There is no separation of church and state. It’s a fabrication, it’s a fiction, it’s not in the constitution. It’s made up by secular humanists.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 6 July 2022

Non-Scale VICTORY, Bitches!

Non-Scale victory!

I didn't think I've been losing any weight on the Ozempic. I cannot stand on my scale to find out, due to pain. So, yeah.

Welp.

Guess what?

Yesterday, my wedding rings fell RIGHT off my fingers. RIGHT off. I put them back on, they fell off again.

My rings are sterling silver, so they're cheap to replace. I ordered a new pair in a smaller size, they'll be here tomorrow.

Pic is the rings that won't stay on. New ones are identical, but smaller, and for now, shinier

FUCK YEAH!

Don’t waste your Libtard New Age Empathy on Charlie, folks. He didn't want it!

Charlie Kirk made his positions very clear while he was alive. One was: “I think empathy is a made up New Age term that does a lot of damage.” That wasn’t satire. That was strategy. He didn’t misunderstand empathy. He flat-out rejected it. Not because it failed, but because it interfered. Empathy demanded accountability. It disrupted the performance of cruelty. It ruined the punchline when the punchline was someone else’s pain.

Charlie Kirk built a platform on contempt and called it courage. He monetized mockery and called it truth. He weaponized detachment and called it clarity. This wasn’t rebellion. It was auditioning for power. And every time he dismissed empathy as weakness, he revealed exactly what kind of strength he admired.

Empathy wasn’t his failure. It was the firewall he refused to install. And now that he’s gone, we’re left with the wreckage of what happens when that firewall is missing.

I have no fucking empathy for him. I am sorry for the pain his wife and kids are experiencing in the now, but let's be real, here:

My husband's wife died when their kids were 3, 6, 9, and 12. When he told them she'd died, the 3 year old cried for five minutes, then asked to watch some godawful kids show and never again cried about her. Out of sight, out of mind. The 6 year old stopped grieving in less than six months. The nine year old was no longer grieving by the time I joined the family two years later. The 12 year old still grieves on some level, he is 36 now and was very much Mama's boy, so that makes sense. None of the three younger ones really remember her very much. 3 year old (now 27) not at all, 6 year old (now 30) one memory of her spanking him, 9 year old (now 33) a couple of memories of roller skating and talking about Hello Kitty.

So while I'm sorry for the pain Kirk's kids are feeling at the moment, I'm pretty damn sure they won't even remember it later in life. His wife is another story. But if she's much like him, I fucking well have no empathy to spare for her, either.

Maybe that makes me a stone cold bitch. So be it.

Time to put this motherfucker firmly in the past. May his name be forgotten, may his legacy be erased. May all memory of him and all vestiges of him disappear from this planet. Leave him in the sewer treatment facility of history, where he belongs.

Quora Is a Troll Farm, Not a Forum

Quora is rotting from the inside out. Once a space for genuine questions and thoughtful answers, it’s now a cesspool of troll-bait, fake dilemmas, and performative idiocy designed to provoke outrage and harvest engagement.

Case in point: “I caught my 13-year-old daughter using pads for her period without my permission. What do I do now?”  

My reply was: "Are you fucking serious? What was she supposed to do? Bleed down her leg? Sit in a puddle of blood until Daddy grants her access to basic hygiene? No person with a functioning brain thinks anyone, of any age, needs permission to use sanitary products."

And this isn’t an isolated incident. Quora is flooded with these bait-posts: “My son came out as gay, should I kick him out?” “My wife gained weight, can I cheat?” “My daughter wants to wear pants, how do I stop her?” These aren’t real questions. They’re rage-farming algorithms disguised as discourse. They exist to piss people off, rack up comments, and keep the outrage machine churning.

Quora isn’t a knowledge base anymore. It’s a fucking troll farm with a search bar. And every time we engage, even to call out the bullshit, we feed it. So here’s the deal: I’ll keep calling it out, because I’m no longer pretending this platform deserves respect. It’s not a forum. It’s a landfill. And I’m here to name the trash.

Charlie Kirk Got Shot Today. The Chickens Are Coming Home to Roost.

Charlie Kirk, the smug-faced piss-gargling asshole founder of Turning Point USA, got shot in the neck today at Utah Valley University. Mid-event, mid-rant, mid-whatever-the-fuck he was spewing, someone fired a round from 200 yards out and dropped him. He was rushed to Timpanogos Regional Hospital in critical condition and died hours later. He was 31.

Initial reports claimed a suspect had been taken into custody, but police now confirm that the man detained was not the shooter. The actual gunman remains at large, and the investigation is ongoing. The shot was fired from a building across campus, and authorities are still trying to identify who pulled the trigger.

Meanwhile, the headlines are already frothing with “thoughts and prayers” and “political violence” and “how did we get here?” as if this country hasn’t been fucking boiling over with rage and hypocrisy for years.

Let me be clear: I’m not celebrating. I don’t cheer for shooters. I don’t glorify violence. But I’m also not shedding a single tear for motherfucker Charlie Kirk. The man built his asshole brand on division, on smug superiority, on weaponizing youth and ignorance into a political machine that feeds off outrage and misinformation. He spent years punching down, mocking the vulnerable, and turning campuses into battlegrounds for his performative bullshit. And now that the chaos he helped cultivate turned on him, the same people who laughed at others’ pain want us to cry for his?

FUCK no.

Just seconds before Charlie-boy was hit, a student asked:

“Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?”

Kirk replied:

“Too many.”

Then, when asked about total mass shootings, he added:

“Counting or not counting gang violence?”

That was his final sentence, cut off mid-smug by the bullet.

Let's just watch MAGA now try to pin this on the trans community. Because you fucking KNOW they will, those slimy, filthy, hemorrhoids on the asshole of America.

This isn’t karma. It’s consequence. It’s what happens when you play with fire and pretend you’re immune to the burn. Kirk  damn well doesn’t deserve sainthood, he was a piece of shit. And I refuse to join the chorus of sanitized sympathy just because the violence finally landed on someone with a microphone.

The internet wasted no time dragging receipts. A viral tweet resurfaced Kirk’s own words: “I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.” That quote now sits next to a photo of him recoiling mid-shot, wearing a shirt that says “FREEDOM.” You can’t script irony this fucking savage. He defended the cost and then paid it.

And now Trump’s ordered the fucking flag lowered for Charlie Kirk. Lowered. As if this smug, divisive, chaos-peddling asshole deserves the same national reverence as fallen soldiers or civil rights icons. It’s not just inappropriate, it’s fucking shameful. Kirk didn’t die defending the country. He didn’t sacrifice himself for justice or unity. He NEVER did anything for the good of this nation and its people! He died inside the toxic circus he helped build, and now the government’s flying the flag at half-staff like he’s some kind of martyr? Fuck that. This is not honor, it’s political theater, and it spits in the face of every legitimate legacy that flag has ever represented.

We can condemn the act without canonizing the target. We can reject violence without rewriting history to paint Kirk as some innocent thought leader who just wanted “dialogue.” He wanted dominance. He wanted control. And now he’s dead—taken out by the very chaos he helped unleash.

Let’s be brutally fucking clear: Charlie Kirk is no martyr. He didn’t die for a cause. He died inside the chaos he helped engineer. This wasn’t some tragic sacrifice or noble stand. It was the inevitable endpoint of a man who spent years baiting rage, stoking division, and daring the world to hit back. He begged to be a target with every smug broadcast, every campus provocation, every weaponized lie. And now he’s dead. Not because he was brave, but because he was reckless. I won’t rewrite that truth to make anyone feel better.

Annex First, Ask Never: Putin’s DIY Empire Kit

When your empire cosplay gets a map and a microphone but still smells like Cold War leftovers.

Vladimir Putin isn’t trying to resurrect the Soviet Union because he misses the good old days of bread lines and state-run toothpaste. He’s doing it because he wants the fucking empire back. The control. The goddam fear. The geopolitical middle finger to the West. And he’s not fucking subtle about it.

In December 2021, the Kremlin dropped a diplomatic load of shit on NATO’s doorstep: roll back to your 1997 borders or else. Translation? Get your tanks, troops, and treaties the hell out of Eastern Europe. Poland, the Baltics, everyone who joined after the Cold War goes right back in the penalty box. It was a formal demand, not a drunken rant. The West, predictably, told him to shove it.

But Putin wasn’t just bluffing. He’s been building his little empire brick by brick, starting with the Union State, which is a dusty old framework signed with Belarus in 1999 that’s now being used to absorb annexed Ukrainian territories like they’re overdue fucking library books. It’s not communism he’s after. It’s control. Influence. A map that screams "Russia owns this so fuck you!" in bold red ink.

The global reaction? A mix of panic, defiance, and 'are you fucking serious?" Eastern Europe went full porcupine: spikes out, defense budgets up, NATO ties reinforced like grandma’s bridge club after a scandal. Armenia, once a loyal lapdog, realized Moscow wouldn’t lift a freaking finger during regional chaos and started sniffing around for new friends (Hello, Donald Fucking Trump). Kazakhstan and the rest of Central Asia? Quietly ghosting Russia like a bad Tinder date.

This isn’t about ideology. It’s about power. About rewriting borders and flipping the bird to every post-Cold War agreement. Whether Putin ends up with a shiny new empire or a flaming pile of geopolitical regret is still up for grabs. But the world’s not buying the nostalgia act. They see the playbook. And they’re not fucking playing along.